Isaak impressed by fun Yusuf Islam, Chris talks about interviewing Yusuf Islam (Cat Stevens) Options

[Angiekay]

Regardless of Stuff's opinions on this or any other topic - and whether you agree with them or not - she has every right to express them when, and wherever she chooses, Angie. Unlike you, I AM qualified to comment on her character because I know the lady personally in RL, and can tell you that you'd have to go a hell of a long way to find a better human being. We're poles apart politcally-speaking also, but at the end of the day who gives a shit? Life's too short and good friends too hard to find these days to let something as trivial as opinions on politics or rockstars (that's current ones, has-been ones, come-back ones, Islamic ones, or even pretty-boy, blue-eyed ones from Stockton) get in the way of a good friendship. Something else I know Stuff wouldn't do, and that's judge a person's entire character simply by a few words posted on an internet message forum.....I find it kind of ironic that that's the very thing you're doing Angie, while you accuse her of not knowing what she's talking about......

I see...so what you are essentially telling me is...that because it's a free country and she can give an opinion even if tacky, ridiculing and uneducated she should just get away with it? Gotcha. So, when the time comes around that she insults something that pertains to YOU or anyone else on this board, we should "just let it pass" because it's her opinion? Her character and her opinion are two totally different things. She could be the pope, but if she comes on here talking out of her ass about something *I* can tell she knows nothing about because I HAVE LIVED IT, you can damn well bet I'm going to call her out.

Sorry, if the rest of you want to pussyfoot around that kind of thing because it doesn't rock the boat, you go right ahead. I'm calling a spade a spade. Your lives must be awfully vanilla cookie cutter.

[senayr]

ok girls, take a deep breath, two steps back and push away the keyboard.

Lets just agree to disagree and perhaps a Mod or Admin can lock the thread

We need to get back to talking about Mr Sparkly Pants

[guestagain]

Ah, yes, I remember you now, unfortunately. I see you still have nothing useful or productive to say or contribute besides hate. Sad really. Sorry, I can debate all day, but not with someone who is unarmed from the get go...and a coward to boot.

Still waiting on your SSN Kunt Princess. What's wrong. you're too cowardly to post it?

Fine, i'll settle for your phone numer. Or your Myspace profile. Or Facebook page. Or real last name. Or driver's license number. Or mugshot. Or home address. Or work number. Or tax ID number. Really, I must know who I'm speaking to in order to take you seriously, and all I know is your CI board moniker. What's your middle name? Am I scaring you? Come on, show us your real identity. What's to be afraid of? Chicken! I dare you. Prove yourself.

And yes, Kunt princess, people ARE allowed to express opinions that YOU don't like. In America and even in Australia. Amazing, I know. All you've managed to prove is that you are pissed off, NOT that you are right or knowledgeable or any better than anyone. Just that you are pissed off.

[guestagain]

I see...so what you are essentially telling me is...that because it's a free country and she can give an opinion even if tacky, ridiculing and uneducated she should just get away with it? Gotcha. So, when the time comes around that she insults something that pertains to YOU or anyone else on this board, we should "just let it pass" because it's her opinion? Her character and her opinion are two totally different things. She could be the pope, but if she comes on here talking out of her ass about something *I* can tell she knows nothing about because I HAVE LIVED IT, you can damn well bet I'm going to call her out.

Sorry, if the rest of you want to pussyfoot around that kind of thing because it doesn't rock the boat, you go right ahead. I'm calling a spade a spade. Your lives must be awfully vanilla cookie cutter.

Ah, the dulcid tones of Angie KforKunt demonstrating her superior intelligence and unfailing civility. Sweet indeed.

[kazz227]

Ah, the dulcid tones of Angie KforKunt demonstrating her superior intelligence and unfailing civility. Sweet indeed.

Ah, I think you mean 'dulcet tones'. But who am I to question your obvious 'superior intelligence'? As for your 'unfailing civility', well 'nuff' said. Your sentence said it all really. But your posts always do lean towards 'unfailing civility'. A true example for all for us, I guess 'Guestagain" NOT.

Oh, for the record - and I am guessing you were aiming for alliteration here - it is universally known as the 'C' Word. Guestagain, trying too hard and looking ignorant again. Wouldn't mistake you for intelligent or civil or sweet though, would we?

[guestagain]

Ah, I think you mean 'dulcet tones'. But who am I to question your obvious 'superior intelligence'? As for your 'unfailing civility', well 'nuff' said. Your sentence said it all really. But your posts always do lean towards 'unfailing civility'. A true example for all for us, I guess 'Guestagain" NOT.

Oh, for the record - and I am guessing you were aiming for alliteration here - it is universally known as the 'C' Word. Guestagain, trying too hard and looking ignorant again. Wouldn't mistake you for intelligent or civil or sweet though, would we?

LOL, are you and Chery's Crazy the Dim Siamese twins, or do you just share the brain cell? If you were able to follow a thread, you'd see that I was referring to Angie <b>K for K-U-N-T </b>'s repeated claim of unfailing civility, and calling her on the obvious fact that she's as rude a dumb cunt as many others who post here, despite her delusions of grandeur and claims to the contrary. Thanks for helping to underscore my point though.

[kazz227]

LOL, are you and Chery's Crazy the Dim Siamese twins, or do you just share the brain cell? If you were able to follow a thread, you'd see that I was referring to Angie <b>K for K-U-N-T </b>'s repeated claim of unfailing civility, and calling her on the obvious fact that she's as rude a dumb cunt as many others who post here, despite her delusions of grandeur and claims to the contrary. Thanks for helping to underscore my point though.

Ah, dim, rude, dumb....YOU shouldn't attempt to bring attention to your obvious 'qualities' by trying to attribute them to others.

If you could follow a thread, you'd have read that I called you on your poor attempt at alliteration. Yes, I did get why you added the "K". A dumb, simple, pathetic attempt at alliteration on your part. I do hope my 'dulcid tones' get the point across this time. It might help if you sound out the big words.

[guestagain]

Ah, dim, rude, dumb....YOU shouldn't attempt to bring attention to your obvious 'qualities' by trying to attribute them to others.

If you could follow a thread, you'd have read that I called you on your poor attempt at alliteration. Yes, I did get why you added the "K". A dumb, simple, pathetic attempt at alliteration on your part. I do hope my 'dulcid tones' get the point across this time. It might help if you sound out the big words.

I tell you what. You stop talking out of your ass, and you may sound a bit more like someone worth listening to. Try it if you can, see if ir works.

[kazz227]

I tell you what. You stop talking out of your ass, and you may sound a bit more like someone worth listening to. Try it if you can, see if ir works.

ROTFLMAO! YOU are SO obviously 'listening' to what I am writing!!!!!!. How novel, and clever of you. I must be worth a good listen. Or is it that I am worth a good read? YOU keep replying!

Stop ranting at everyone out of your arse. Yes, you are a huge arse. Wait, here is a better idea for you. Why don't you take your clever rants, amazing wit, superiority complex and 'dulcid tones' elsewhere.

Ta, ta.....sunshine.

[guestagain]

ROTFLMAO! YOU are SO obviously 'listening' to what I am writing!!!!!!. How novel, and clever of you. I must be worth a good listen. Or is it that I am worth a good read? YOU keep replying!

Stop ranting at everyone out of your arse. Yes, you are a huge arse. Wait, here is a better idea for you. Why don't you take your clever rants, amazing wit, superiority complex and 'dulcid tones' elsewhere.

Ta, ta.....sunshine.

Well, I'd say don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, but we know that nothing has poked you there since at least 1973, so I'd hate to deprive you of your moment of fun. Have a field day, Stench.

[kazz227]

Well, I'd say don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, but we know that nothing has poked you there since at least 1973, so I'd hate to deprive you of your moment of fun. Have a field day, Stench.

LOL! '73!!!!! You'd be the oldest, driest prune on the planet that takes it up the arse on this board. I hope you continue to get it too, and enjoy it. It might make you a happier - but still old, bitter and twisted tosser.

Putrid, I hope that came across in my most respectful, 'dulcid tone.'

[filly]

Please clarify...what was it you think that you are educating people about?

And what was it you think that Stuff knows nothing about? She stated her opinions. You spewed yours and according to you she should "shut it" because you disagree with her.

Are you actually disputing the radical practices aspects of Muslim religion? You are disputing the fact that Muslim women are required to wear heavy garments (like tablecloths) from head to toe and are not allowed to drive and are required to marry whomever their male relatives order them to and are required to undergo genital mutilation before puberty and are routinely murdered for defying their male relatives or divorcing their husbands? Really? Or, are you just disputing the fact that Stuff and most other people find these practices objectionable? Does that mean that you think these practices are fine and dandy as long as the women agree to being stoned, mutilated, raped and murdered? Or, under what circumstances do you find these practices to be acceptable?

Since you are so educated on this topic, please link us to your informational sources which disprove the occurrence of these practices. I promise I will faithfully read whatever educational information you are able to present on this topic.

Or, did you just mean to dispute the fact that Stuff and most other people find these practices to be extremely objectionable? (You know, going back to your statement of how you are allowed to post your opinion because you know more than Stuff does, etc...)

It seems like some people here have a lot of prejudices against Muslims. Perhaps you are influenced by the western media which likes to paint Muslims as being evil.

The problem is not that Islam breeds violence and crime but polygamy. According to Psychology Today, countries in the Middle East and Africa where polygamy is legal are the most violent in the world. In those countries, because men can have many wives, there is a shortage of women. As a result, there will be some men who will never get married if they are too poor to afford a wife. Feeling like they have no future, these poor, single men will engage in more risky behaviour such as crime, terrorism, violence & rape. They will also become envious of men who have wives and will resort to rape if they can't have wives of their own. Women in Middle East must keep their heads covered as a protection against rape. However, the head covering doesn't protect them from rape since the envy of poor, unattached men from not having a wife is still present. This explains why the Middle East and Africa have such a high rate in rape and violence against women. The high rape rate in Africa have lead to the Aids epidemic among women in Africa. Polygamy also explains why it's one of the reasons that the United States is the most violent country in the western world. The U.S. has the highest population of polygamists in the western world.